Over the Christmas weekend I had time for my annual tasting of the Courage Russian Imperial Stout clone that James and I brewed four and a half years ago. The timing couldn't have been better since a few days prior I got my first taste of the (newly re-resurrected) original which is now being brewed by Wells and Young. The commercial version did not have any Brett funk that mine does, but it did have a firm charcoal roasted bitterness from the heavy-handed use of black patent. It was interesting to taste a beer at such a young age that is built for aging (the bottle we had was brewed this summer).
It seems like so few of the American brewed Imperial Stouts are designed for graceful aging. The high level of sweetness in many examples (about 1.060 in the case of 3 Floyds Dark Lord) requires massive hopping to counter. The problem is that as the bitterness fades the beer loses that balance and ends up sugary sweet. Alternatively, some versions have gotten so strong that they need to age for a couple years before approaching drinkable. The bottle of The Bruery's 19% ABV Black Tuesday I had at the same tasting was so boozy that I couldn't taste anything else. Does anyone really want an aged beer that has alcohol of sugar as the primary flavor? I am not advocating 7% ABV Imperial stouts that finish at 1.005, but you are not going to get beer drinkers coming back to beers that are undrinkable in excess of 2 oz.
I'm hoping to pick up a few bottles of the Courage to store away for a few years to see if this newest incarnation has the agability of its predecessors. I may also have to rebrew my recipe without the Brett to see how close it is.
Courage RIS Clone
Appearance – Dark, dark, brown body. The dense tan foam floats well for a few minutes before falling, leaving only a thin wispy covering.
Smell – Has more of basement Brett funk than I remember in previous years, plenty of Bretty wet hay. Nice coffee roast character as well as dark fruit (prunes?). Still not showing its age negatively, although it is interesting that the funk seems to be increasing despite the lack of live Brett.
Taste – The flavor has less funk than the nose, with more cocoa and coffee. There is some vanillin oak as well. The bitterness (hop and roast) is mostly gone, leaving even a 1.020 beer sweetish, but the alcohol is still enough to balance.
Mouthfeel – More carbonation than I like in a big dark beer, but it is stable (at this point I don't think it will change). The body is moderate for an RIS, it is amazing how thick some of the American versions of the style are.
Drinkability & Notes – As always this beer is a nice Christmas treat when I visit my parents for the holidays. Almost halfway to my goal of hanging onto at least a few bottles for ten years, hopefully the beer continues to evolve and improve.
Agreed. Thanks Mike for your coverage of this subject. Overly dense and cloying Russian Imperial Stouts (or any other beers) are enjoyable for very few. I would not want to buy a special-edition beer, only to discover it to be nauseatingly-sweet and not built for ageing. Too high gravity finishes are too easy to do and are not something that should be foisted on all of us who happily support the craft brew industry.
ReplyDeleteConversely, I’ve been interested in pushing the other side of the fermentation spectrum approaching near-hyper attenuation. My latest push in the RIS category has finished at 1.006 in tertiary, with an OG of 1.121.
This ale underwent an 001 primary fermentation and secondary feeding with the gravity stabilizing at 1.030. At that point I bottled a small portion and then introduced more sugar and portion of high-krausen 099 (super high gravity) starter to the fermentor. Presently, the ale is mellow enough at 20 months old and 15%, and is awaiting bottling (I’m still deciding whether to attempt bottle-conditioning).
To me, this ale possesses the desireable qualities I associate with high-gravity ales--intensity and depth of flavor, unmistakable alcohol presence, ample body and density--and yet it has an ever-present levity that seems most obvious in the after-sensation. It’s as if the higher alcohols evaporate a bit off the tongue with each sip, leaving an unusual impression on me for such a big beer.
On a slightly side note, these and other experiments have me thinking that the fears of “over”-attenuation (thin body, excessive dryness, reduction of flavor) are unwarranted if the recipe, temps and process are right. I’ve noted time and again that the higher alcohols that are produced can provide ample sweetness in ales finishing even below 1.000.
Super post! I`ll send it to all my friends!
ReplyDeleteI know this thread is old, but I'm gonna brew a RIS this fall. I don't like overly cloying beers, but I want sufficient body. Yeast will be WLP007 (English Dry), I already have it.
ReplyDeleteTL;DR : How to make full-bodied RIS without is being cloying ?
Mash temp ? Sugar ? Of course there will be flaked oat and barley, but how much can I put ? More attenuative yeast (maybe Belgian) ?
Check out my recipe and tell be what you guys think.
Thanks!
* without IT
ReplyDelete